Judge Rejects Keurig’s Motion to Dismiss In K-Cup Monopoly Suits

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017, Judge Vernon S. Broderick, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, rejected Keurig Green Mountain Inc.’s (“Keurig”) motion to dismiss multiple lawsuits against Keurig and its parent company, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) brought by purchasers of K-Cup coffee pods. The lawsuits allege Keurig’s coffee maker freezes out competitors’ coffee cups as part of an anti-competitive scheme.

In June 2014, eight lawsuits against Defendants alleging various anti-competitive actions were combined into a multi-district litigation. According to the lawsuits, Keurig allegedly discouraged consumers from buying other companies’ single-serve pods by falsely claiming they could cause their machines to fail, filed baseless patent infringement lawsuits against competitors, improperly acquired competitors, entered into exclusionary agreements with suppliers and distributors to prevent competitors from entering the market, and introduced a product redesign that allegedly locks out non-Keurig branded cups.

The legal team at SFMS has significant experience litigating class action matters. If you have any questions regarding this subject or this posting, please contact Nick Lussier (nlussier@sfmslaw.com) or Chiharu Sekino (csekino@sfmslaw.com). We can also be reached toll-free at (866) 540-5505.

Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP is a law firm with offices in California, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. SFMS is an active member of Integrated Advisory Group (www.iaginternational.org), which provides us with the ability to provide our clients with access to excellent legal and accounting resources throughout the globe. For more information about our firm, please visit us at www.sfmslaw.com.


Simpson, Dave. “Keurig Green Mountain Can’t Stop K-Cup Monopoly Suits.” Law 360. Last modified on December 4, 2017.