Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
866-540-5505 877-891-9880

Dedicated Client Advocacy

Posts tagged "employment"

Uber to Pay Waymo $245 Million in Equity to Settle Trade Secret Lawsuit

On February 9, 2018, Uber Technologies Inc. ("Uber") and Waymo LLC ("Waymo") announced a deal in which Uber will pay Waymo 0.34 percent of its equity to settle Waymo's claims that it stole trade secrets and infringed patents related to Waymo's proprietary laser system used to help guide driverless vehicles. At a $72 billion valuation, 0.34 percent of Uber's equity equates to approximately $245 million. As part of the deal, Uber also has agreed not to incorporate Waymo trade secrets into its autonomous vehicle hardware and software.

Columbia To Appeal NLRB Grad Student Unionization Ruling

On January 30, 2018, Columbia University ("Columbia") announced in a campus-wide letter that it will not bargain with the representatives of graduate student assistants ("GSAs") that won a union election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") and will instead challenge the NLRB's ruling that deemed the GSAs employees in a federal appeals court.

Logistics Company Proposes $2.9M Settlement To End Employment Class Action

On January 10, 2018, supply chain company, Geodis LLC ("Geodis"), announced a proposed deal in which it will pay approximately $2.9 million to settle employment claims brought against Ozburn-Hessey Logistics LLC ("Ozburn-Hessey") ("Defendant"), which was acquired by Geodis in 2015.

United Airlines Sued Under Illinois Biometrics Law

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, a class of employees led by former United baggage handler, David Johnson (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), sued United Airlines Inc. ("United" or "Defendant") under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA"). The suit claims United's timekeeping system, which requires employees to clock-in and clock-out using their fingerprints, does not comply with BIPA regulations.

New Jersey Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Ruling Permitting Age Bias Suit Against Best Buy To Move Forward

On Monday, November 20, 2017, the New Jersey Supreme Court denied a petition for certification filed by Best Buy Co. Inc. ("Best Buy") to review a state appellate panel decision regarding a former employee's age discrimination lawsuit on the grounds that the ex-worker, Kevin Dugan ("Dugan"), never explicitly agreed to a policy that such disputes be arbitrated.

$1.95M Settlement In Class Action Against Moët Granted Preliminary Approval

On Tuesday, November 14, 2017, Alameda Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman gave preliminary approval to a proposed $1.95 million settlement to resolve a class action against Moët Hennessey USA ("Moët") and Strategic Experiential Group ("SEG") (collectively, the "Defendants") over alleged employee misclassification.